As part of the activities of the Unified Guidance Week, the University Psychological Counseling Unit at the College of Physical Education and Sports Sciences for Women at the University of Baghdad, under the supervision of its head, Lect. Dr. Hind Salem Taieh organized a distinguished scientific debate between fourth-year female students from the morning and evening study programs. This activity included academic initiatives to develop students’ skills, promote a culture of dialogue, and encourage positive competition.
The debate addressed a range of sports-related questions and was characterized by enthusiasm and academic commitment. The participating students demonstrated a high level of persuasive ability, organization of ideas, and competence in responding to questions.
At the conclusion of the debate, the members of the judging panel praised the advanced level displayed by the students, emphasizing the importance of such activities in refining students’ academic personalities and enhancing communication and teamwork skills. The results announced the Morning Program team’s victory, with the highest evaluation from the committee.
It is worth noting that this debate forms part of the department’s plan to support extracurricular activities and to provide an interactive educational environment that enables students to apply their theoretical knowledge in constructive, practical discussions.
As part of the activities of the Unified Guidance Week, the University Psychological Counseling Unit at the College of Physical Education and Sports Sciences for Women at the University of Baghdad, under the supervision of its head, Lect. Dr. Hind Salem Taieh organized a distinguished scientific debate between fourth-year female students from the morning and evening study programs. This activity included academic initiatives to develop students’ skills, promote a culture of dialogue, and encourage positive competition.
The debate addressed a range of sports-related questions and was characterized by enthusiasm and academic commitment. The participating students demonstrated a high level of persuasive ability, organization of ideas, and competence in responding to questions.
At the conclusion of the debate, the members of the judging panel praised the advanced level displayed by the students, emphasizing the importance of such activities in refining students’ academic personalities and enhancing communication and teamwork skills. The results announced the Morning Program team’s victory, with the highest evaluation from the committee.
It is worth noting that this debate forms part of the department’s plan to support extracurricular activities and to provide an interactive educational environment that enables students to apply their theoretical knowledge in constructive, practical discussions.
